list4xt : Mailing list for the XT users community.[list4xt] Re: Volunteer : documentationSubject: [list4xt] Re: Volunteer : documentationUser: Website From: Ron Ten-Hove (rtenhove@forte.com)Date: 02/06/2000 - 00:18
Paul,
Perhaps my use of the terms "primary" and "secondary" imply too much.
I would submit that the goal of the detailed documentation would be
My proposal to use JavaDoc for the detailed docs is motivated partly
I agree that examples make such discussions more concrete. Let me
-Ron
-----Original Message-----
1) This effort can be easily partitioned, as Java packages, so we
# Agree. The packages are not messy, re-engeneering on per-package basics
2) The primary internal documentation should be JavaDoc.
# Not sure. I think that the first thing needed could be a 'view from top'
3) Secondary documentation should include an overview of the system
# Hm... To me this is first, but javadoc is secondary ;-)
Rgds.Paul.
# PS. Ah - this will be great to get some examples... After I'l look at one
Eric's
"It would fit in the documentation I have begun to write about SAX and XT
Was realy very hepful. If some day we get some ( outline, 'sample' )
Just 2c.
---------------------------------
-- Mailing list for the XT users community. (http://rvffcu.org) (mailto:list4xt-request@4xt.org?Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe)
Archive générée par hypermail 2b28 le 06/11/2001 - 11:46 CET |