list4xt : Mailing list for the XT users community.

[list4xt] Re: Naive XSLT [was: Sun XSLT compiler]

User: Website

New Message
• Reply
• Next message: Khun Yee Fung: "[list4xt] Extensions to XT"
• Previous message: Leigh Dodds: "[list4xt] Re: Sun XSLT compiler"
• In reply to: Karen Lease: "[list4xt] Re: Naive XSLT [was: Sun XSLT compiler]"
• Next in thread: Dave Pawson: "[list4xt] Re: Sun XSLT compiler"
• Reply: Leigh Dodds: "[list4xt] Re: Naive XSLT [was: Sun XSLT compiler]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: karen@front3m.grolier.fr [mailto:karen@front3m.grolier.fr]On
> Behalf Of Karen Lease
> Sent: 19 June 2000 23:09
> To: list4xt@4xt.org
> Subject: [list4xt] Re: Naive XSLT [was: Sun XSLT compiler]
>

> K: Even XT uses a kind of DOM. But the om package is a very light-weight
> DOM, really a mini-grove implementation. I read once that J. Clark had
> not used DOM because he didn't like it, probably because it is difficult
> to make an efficient one. Maybe this is one of the reasons for XT's
> speed.

Yes, its my understanding that all current processors build a DOM of
one form or another, and it was this approach that the speaker was
criticising.

However (getting back to business), perhaps om would be a useful
place to start when documenting an overview of XT? Particularly if its
very efficient.

L.

--
Mailing list for the XT users community.     (http://freelinksdirectory.net)
(mailto:list4xt-request@4xt.org?Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe)

• Next message: Khun Yee Fung: "[list4xt] Extensions to XT"
• Previous message: Leigh Dodds: "[list4xt] Re: Sun XSLT compiler"
• In reply to: Karen Lease: "[list4xt] Re: Naive XSLT [was: Sun XSLT compiler]"
• Next in thread: Dave Pawson: "[list4xt] Re: Sun XSLT compiler"
• Reply: Leigh Dodds: "[list4xt] Re: Naive XSLT [was: Sun XSLT compiler]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]