list4xt : Mailing list for the XT users community.

[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)

User: Website

New Message
• Reply
• Next message: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Previous message: Igor Sokolowsky: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• In reply to: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Next in thread: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Reply: Marcel Ruff: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I think it's time, then, to ask the question again:
>
> Should we let XT fade away
> (and if not, is anyone willing to help) ?

I still use XT because of its high performance
and will do so for a while.

But i keep on looking for other XSLT implementations,
and i think to switch to another one as soon as the
performance is good enough.

The main reason is that there is no development
on XT anymore.

In the beginning of 4xt i hoped to contribute,
but cvs was never set up, so i lost interest.

Thanks nevertheless for 4xt and
you efforts in the xml/xsl world Eric!

regards,

Marcel

-- 
Marcel Ruff
mailto:ruff@swand.lake.de
http://www.lake.de/home/lake/swand/
http://www.xmlBlaster.org
--
Mailing list for the XT users community.     (http://accountingsolutionsllc.com)
(mailto:list4xt-request@4xt.org?Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe)

• Next message: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Previous message: Igor Sokolowsky: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• In reply to: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Next in thread: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Reply: Marcel Ruff: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]