list4xt : Mailing list for the XT users community.

[list4xt] Re: CVS and sourceforge (was:Should we let XT fade away (Last Call))

User: Website

New Message
• Reply
• Next message: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Name"
• Previous message: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• In reply to: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] CVS and sourceforge (was:Should we let XT fade away (Last Call))"
• Next in thread: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Name"
• Reply: Gavin Thomas Nicol: "[list4xt] Re: CVS and sourceforge (was:Should we let XT fade away (Last Call))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> If we decide to move ahead, we will need to define which name we want to
> use.
>
> Would we like to continue using XT as a name (assuming James Clark gives
> us his blessing to do it) or would another name (OpenXT for instance
> even though the name has been used by a Sun command) be less confusing ?

OpenXT is fine (though open is used way too much nowadays)... I kind of
like 4xt too. Perhaps oxt, or eXTra?

--
Mailing list for the XT users community.     (http://nebankct.com)
(mailto:list4xt-request@4xt.org?Subject=unsubscribe to unsubscribe)

• Next message: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Name"
• Previous message: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Re: Should we let XT fade away (Last Call)"
• In reply to: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] CVS and sourceforge (was:Should we let XT fade away (Last Call))"
• Next in thread: Eric van der Vlist: "[list4xt] Name"
• Reply: Gavin Thomas Nicol: "[list4xt] Re: CVS and sourceforge (was:Should we let XT fade away (Last Call))"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]